nomadshot.blogg.se

1. #POWERSHELL BATCH SCRIPT EXAMPLE INSTALL#
2. #POWERSHELL BATCH SCRIPT EXAMPLE WINDOWS 7#
3. #POWERSHELL BATCH SCRIPT EXAMPLE WINDOWS#

This is not to say that PowerShell is not accessible - it’s just built on top of a larger framework and thus has a moderate learning curve attached. NET base components, you will probably find PowerShell much more difficult to learn. Unless you are already familiar with the. If you are not a developer and have never used a scripting language before, you might find VBScript a bit harder to learn, but there are still resources and existing script libraries out there to help you get started on your first scripts. So, if you are already familiar with a scripting language or Visual Basic, you might find VBScript quite easy to learn. While PowerShell can be used for scripting, it is primarily meant to be a shell. Learning Curve/Existing Scripts ^įor starters, we should be clear about one thing: VBScript is a scripting language.

#POWERSHELL BATCH SCRIPT EXAMPLE WINDOWS#

This can be a real deal-breaker if your architecture utilizes Windows Server 2003 or XP clients.

#POWERSHELL BATCH SCRIPT EXAMPLE WINDOWS 7#

For example, the Active Directory module - an important one for most systems admins - requires Windows 7 and/or Windows Server 2008 R2. In many cases, PowerShell simply cannot perform all of its functions on pre-Windows Server 2008/Windows 7 systems.

Perhaps you will want to use a VBScript to automate this process!

#POWERSHELL BATCH SCRIPT EXAMPLE INSTALL#

More importantly, it is not included in Windows distributions predating Windows Server 2008 and Windows 7, so you will need to deploy and install PowerShell on all of your XP, Vista, and Server 2003 hosts before you can get up and running with it. The Windows Scripting Host dates back to Windows 98, so VBScript can be deployed to all of your Windows clients “out of the box.” On the other hand, PowerShell was released in 2006 and requires at least Windows XP. NET roughly offsets the inefficiency of using COM components - but the bottom line here is that performance should not be a consideration when choosing between VBScript and PowerShell. We can speculate about why this would be the case - perhaps the added overhead of. In reality, however, PowerShell and VBScript are roughly the same in terms of efficiency. Intuitively, one might think that PowerShell should blow VBScript out of the water in terms of performance given the fact that PowerShell is “integrated” with the kernel and VBScript relies on a COM interpreter. NET application like Exchange via VBScript. NET functionality, it is usually difficult or impossible to manage a. Because VBScript is now deprecated and does not respect. In fact, the folks who developed Exchange 2007 actually built the entire management console using one-line PowerShell commands (called cmdlets) that do the dirty work for you behind the scenes.

NET, meaning that it utilizes the base classes and is capable of interacting with some applications (especially Microsoft ones) that cannot be manipulated via VBScript. VBScript utilizes COM components to access features while PowerShell is built on top of. The difference between them is more about how they actually acheive those features, and in most cases, PowerShell takes the cake. Both VBScript and PowerShell offer similar feature sets.